Okello Chatrie’s cellphone gave him away. Chatrie made off with $195,000 from the bank he robbed in suburban Richmond, ...

Some justices seemed to advocate for a relatively narrow ruling that would clarify what such warrants require, even if it ...

The justices’ decision on whether police can use location history data to track suspects may redefine Fourth Amendment ...

Police track down unidentified suspects through smartphone data. The Supreme Court will decide whether such 'groundbreaking' ...

Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. Naomi Schalit: Okay, I’m going to read the Fourth Amendment – and then you’re going to explain it to us, please! Here goes: “The ...

The US Supreme Court is gearing up to grapple with the extent to which smartphone users surrender their Fourth Amendment rights when they transmit their locations to digital service providers.

A convicted felon wants the Justices to bar ‘geofence’ warrants of the kind that let police catch him in Chatrie v. U.S.

I have been posting on Chatrie v. United States, the Supreme Court's geofencing case to be argued on Monday. In this post, I wanted to talk a bit on why the search question is particularly hard. The ...

“A lot of people are being hypocritical around here,” Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) told HuffPost. Fitzpatrick is a moderate ...

The Trump administration recently asked the U.S. Supreme Court to bless racial profiling by immigration agents, and a majority of the justices have now complied. While this regrettable action is not ...

Perhaps you’ve heard of the Fourth Amendment. That’s the one that guarantees freedom from unfettered government snooping, the one that says government needs probable cause and a warrant before it can ...